Sat 4 Jul 2009
care
Posted by bon under coping stuff, mama-baby stuff
[33] Comments
he is three and i swear he shines.
this child i never imagined, my funny blond curly-headed boy who looks full-sprung from his father’s mother’s side of the family, the child who came into our lives in our deepest grief and whom my most secretbrokenself feared i might never fully claim…this Oscar of mine bursts me open with joy and is my heart with legs.
Thursday he started what was supposed to be his first preschool class, after 2+ years of mostly part-time care with a lovely home sitter whose daughter had become his little missus, bossing him around the house like a happily henpecked pint-size husband. but the other two kids his sitter cared for were much smaller, and he’s an acutely social kid, and we thought he needed a real peer group and maybe a little less tv and more learning opportunities so when a space finally came open at the preschool we’ve been years on the waiting list for, we leapt.
erm, leapt is a strong word. slunk would be more accurate. we slunk with heavy hearts, because we have loved this sitter and she has loved Oscar and her family has been his second family all through the craziness of last year’s bedrest and new baby sister and he cannot remember his life before her. but Dave & i both taught preschool once upon a life or two ago, and we felt that O was cracking for more and that he would thrive in this purported emergent learning setting in ways he simply can’t here at home or with a home sitter, and so we took the spot. which is full-time only, and this bit at my heart with sharp teeth because i’m home for another month and i like having him with Josephine & i on his ‘mommy days’ and it is summer and they will only be small awhile. but we took the spot, because spots are rare and precious in these parts and it is hard enough trying to find a job let alone nurturing placements for two kids at once.
i signed him up for what the new school’s manual call the 3-4 year old preschool class. last week, he visited twice. the graduating kids were all significantly older, of course…but he loved the classroom, engaged immediately with the teachers and the space.
Thursday he started. Dave dropped him off only to find he’s in a group with babies and non-verbal barely two-year-olds. in a room full of “learning materials” he mostly stopped being interested in a long time ago.
the teachers seem warm and engaged and kind, but there are no kids in that room with whom he can talk dinosaurs or play pretend, only crying toddlers suffering through the anxiety of transition. they’ve apparently decided to shift from a 3-4 year old class, which they found didn’t work, to a 2-3 year old class. and O was left standing in the middle of the room plugging his ears.
Dave came home and said, “i feel kinda sick about this.” i walked by the play area an hour later on my way to a job interview, and saw him, his back to me, playing busily alone in the sandbox whilst toddlers milled about him.
the toys & manipulatives are age-inappropriate for him because the staff – quite reasonably – don’t want the little ones eating small, sharp things. but he outgrew their wooden block puzzles years ago; he’s been doing 48 piece puzzles for over a year now. by himself. afternoon outside play involves the older kids, the ones who graduated from his room last week and took all the cool toys with them, but they aren’t really peers either and there is no scaffolding to introduce him to their play. when i asked if they included him outside, he said “they don’t know my name.”
and i think a little coil in my heart came unsprung and did a whirlibird around in my chest cavity, tearing flesh as it went.
they tell me a few more three year olds will start next week, and i am heartened. they didn’t say much about the toys – which they don’t call toys because their pedagogy eschews the plastic crap our society is so enamoured with and dandy that but the stuff all over the classroom might as well be called something and it’s all too young for him no matter what rose you smell it by – but they did assure me, all of them, that in time as they get through this transition that there will be projects geared to his interests and all kinds of wonderful opportunities.
so i am hopeful. we will ride it out for a few more days, wait and see. as i said, i really like the teachers, and the location is fabulous and this place comes highly recommended and i want – oh how i want – to make it work. but it has to work for Oscar. and it is taking all i have right now in this wait and see weekend to trust that they, as professionals, understand that and also have that as their priority. if i am making a significant life change in my child’s world because you have told me you provide a 3 & 4 year olds class, then don’t go changing that to a 2 & 3 year olds class mostly suited to 2 year olds in which my child is waaaay older than the others without telling me, because frankly, he could have stayed happily at home this month and listened to his own personal baby cry for absolutely no charge whatsoever, and if you want me to bear with your transitional period please give me notice that it is coming and give me some sense that you care that it is my child you’re actually planning on using as your guinea pig to determine how the 2 & 3 year-old mix works out.
we have put him through a relatively significant transition in order to be there primarily because we wanted him to have a freaking peer group. and turning him loose amongst the big kids for an hour a day does not make up for the fact that for two days this week he might as well have been stuck in a social playpen. now, in the long run i don’t think that two days will harm him. but it is NOT what we prepared him for, it confused him and us both, and it has had consequences already in terms of how he’s acting out in relation to his sister and us: he’s gone from a stable social situation to an absolutely isolated one in which he has no capital and no social tools to integrate with either of the groups of children there, and given that we signed up for something different the lack of warning makes me terribly, terribly nervous.
i don’t want to be that parent. i don’t think he’s some widdle pwecious pumpkin who’s just too smart for the other plebian rugrats. i do think that he – and us, as paying clients in this business of early learning & childcare, because it is a business and i understand that – deserve the respect of appropriate placements and advance warning of significant changes. i don’t really care if he has carrots with lunch instead of potatoes, or if the wading pool activity is switched to Thursday. i do care if he has no one to play with except babies, or if your idea of emergent curriculum means letting a little boy desperate for kids to talk to loose in a group of big kids without support or efforts to help him integrate.
i want to work. between bedrest and all, i’ve been home now for well over a year, and was home or in hospital for another fifteen months with O before that. since January 2006, i’ve only spent nine months at a f/t job. and i look at this interval as a privilege, from one perspective – getting to have and be with these children i love – but for my physical and professional selves, it’s been house arrest, long seasons of forced invalidity followed by the craziness of colic and the never-enough-time of trying to balance a little freelancing here and there with parenting my children and keeping the cage house to a dull roar. i want the security of a steady job, much as the guilt of this wanting washes over me daily.
the guilt stays at bay much better when i feel like my kids’ care situations are positive. and so Thursday threw me for a loop, because not only did we drop O off into a vastly different setup than we’d believed we’d be doing, but by 4 pm that day i’d been offered the job i interviewed for in the morning.
of course.
i’d thought i’d only have to worry about finding a nurturing place for Posey. by the time the job call came in, i’d picked up my boy and talked to all the teachers and had a pit in my stomach the size of a turnip, wondering if i’d done the wrong thing.
i suspect the essence of parenting for my generation, whatever choices we make regarding who cares for our children and when and how and whatever forms of schooling they receive or what they eat or whether they play soccer or try swimming or can’t do either because of financial constraints, is this: i wonder if i’ve done the wrong thing?
i want to do right by them, these small people with their sticky, pudgy, trusting hands. but sometimes, no matter how i try, i end up feeling a little sick, like the options i’d bet on have slipped through my fingers, figments of a story i’m not writing after all.
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
how did you make the care decisions – and schooling decisions, if your children are older – that you have? were the options you wanted – whether in terms of available placements or work options for yourself or finances – available?




July 4th, 2009 at 11:24 am
I hear you. There’s never the perfect situation, and never enough time in the day to do Everything right. I struggle with this. We put Little Bear in preschool this week, after a year of him wanting to stay there with Brother at dropoff. And it was miserable. He was one of the crying 2’s, and it wasn’t at all what we had hoped. It made me sick, and after 4 days, we pulled him out.
Widget on the other hand, at 4 is fully equipped to deal, and he is in a lovely classroom with 15 kids and not enough teachers, but that’s okay because he has the time and the playmates and the manipulatives (yes, toys) to explore and discover on his own and with playmates. More of a social thing, and I’m grateful for that.
I hope the other 3’s come to school soon, and you can judge it better. Any chance of getting better toys by talking to the director and having some specific types moved back in there?
July 4th, 2009 at 11:45 am
I am sorry that O isn’t going to be in the group that you wanted. That is so frustrating. The hard part about having any part of your child’s care in the hands of others is that you’re never going to be completely happy with their care – there’s been some awful thing each year at school with all of my kids, some thing that I would have had different.
I actually would not want my 3 year old in a group of 4 year olds, necessarily – 4 is a LOT older than 3, and 2 year olds can suddenly make big leaps forward socially. 4 year olds can be old enough to have discovered social cruelty, to have discovered the joys of leaving younger kids out. I hope that some more 3 year olds come in quickly so that he has some same-aged peers, but this might work out nicely.
July 4th, 2009 at 12:05 pm
The first few years of BubTar’s life, he was in an on-site daycare where I worked. KayTar attended for her first year before we realized what was going on with her atypical development. I stayed home to facilitate her crazy schedule of therapy and specialists, and when it was time for school decisions for her, it was easy. The district placed her and we were agreeable. She was in a situation much like O this year, though. She was the highest functioning kid in her class, she would tell me that the other kids couldn’t talk or just screamed all the time…not ideal, I suppose, but she still thrived. She had an hour of “inclusion” time every day with the normal PreK kids, which she loved. It worked, she grew by leaps and bounds this year. Next year, though, I am very excited she will be in an advanced program, with typical peers present full time.
We can’t always find a perfect solution, but usually, good is good enough.
July 4th, 2009 at 12:46 pm
You know, I would be fully prepared to be that parent. I’d be in there already asking why I wasn’t notified in advance of the change and asking what they were going to do about integration, but then, I’m pretty darn opinionated. Not always a popular thing, but the idea of O, and you, being deceived like that makes my instinct to roar rise and boil over.
I hope it gets better and soon.
I just wish there was a way to do anything without the guilt.
Ah, the lives of mothers.
July 4th, 2009 at 12:49 pm
We’e never done formal care-using a combo of luck, and being broke. I worried constantly that Vivian wasn’t getting the right…anything for her since we had no one her age around, and it was really just us (read-me) engaging her educationally.
I was terrified the first day of school.
She was fine. She was better than fine, she was a bloody little rock star who makes me so proud I could just PLOTZ.
I firmly believe that home, you and Dave, will have a far more lasting impact on his development than those toys and other kids. The other kids will help, and it will be incredible to watch them. But you guys set the tone.
I’d be more than a little startled and annoyed by what you found however. If Im sold something, I want it to be what it is…
July 4th, 2009 at 1:13 pm
this is tough. Six months can make a world of difference between 2 and . . . . well, six, I’m finding out. I remember taking Bella in to a class where they informed me “you need to be three and potty trained to attend here!” only to discover some of the kids wouldn’t be turning three until . . . December?! February??!! And I had the same worries — that her skills at home far outpaced what was given to her in the room. And ditto, this school came well recommended.
I discovered that while she may have been — and still is — far ahead of her classmates in some areas, there are others (social skills, art) where she has room to grow. I really don’t think enough can be said about the social skills learned at this age, and those will come even if he is on the older side. In fact, it may be to his benefit since boys tend to lag in this area in comparison to girls. Finally, I think you there’s always time to scootch him up when given the opportunity: we’ve decided to send Bella to Kindergarten next year, where she’ll be one of the youngest. We do this with her teacher’s blessings, that she’s ready. And I think after two years at her pre-K, she really is. Hang tight and see how it goes. It’s always tough.
July 4th, 2009 at 2:02 pm
just to be clear, i don’t think he’s advanced. i’ve taught kids this age and he has the usual mix of strengths and weaknesses, including a relative delay in a lot of physical skills like jumping and catching.
but socially, we expected him to be in with 2005 and 2006 babies, in separate parts of the same room. instead, as an April 2006 baby, he is in a room with 2007 & 2008 babies…that’s the problem. there is no socialization for him in that group beyond the “be gentle, be kind to the little ones” that he’s already getting plenty of at home. it’s not that they are six months younger, it’s that they are a year and more younger. and he is a kid who desperately wants to play with other kids, with peers…which is why we chose to take him from his home sitter and put him in preschool in the first place.
apparently there will be a couple more 2006 babies joining the class, and i hope that will make the difference.
July 4th, 2009 at 2:41 pm
My concern for Oscar in this situation is that he will be the “easiest” because he is more self-sufficient, and he’ll get overlooked. On the other hand, as Beck pointed out, a three with fours can often get overrun…
In our pre-school, Lorenzo was a three in with threes, fours and even the occasional turned-five. He was in awe of the bigger boys, with a bit too much emphasis on the “fear” aspect of it. Not what I was hoping for.
The teachers were thrilled because my son is quiet and well-behaved, but it’s really because he’s cowed. His summer assignment was to learn to write his name. I quickly found out that he can, but he does not cooperate with them. Super.
Keep an eye on the situation, don’t ever hesitate to advocate for him. Don’t hold back because they might think you’re hovering or blind to his real abilities.
July 4th, 2009 at 9:38 pm
I just did a quick count, and between the two kids I’ve dealt with ten different care environments, including one licensed day-care, five home-cares, a nursery school, and kindergarten – and of those, I only feel completely confident about two, that they were absolutely the right place for my children to be. One of those, come to think of it, was the home-care my kids were in when Bub was three, where there were no peers for him to play with. The other was kindergarten. It usually turns out to be a trade-off between loving adults and peer relationships – I have not yet found a place where my kids had both.
July 4th, 2009 at 10:20 pm
We left the United States and came to Canada to raise our kids just because I didn’t like our childcare options AND I was a preschool director! From the inside, I didn’t want to be raising my children there. And for me for you for me, a two and three mix makes little sense to me. Very little. But that’s just me. There are too many potty-training and early socialization issues going on then to focus on the stimulation that three and four year olds need. Hum. Maybe talk with the director again?
So congratulations on the job!
July 4th, 2009 at 10:53 pm
Wowzers. First, “bursts me open with joy and is my heart with legs.” Woman you do this to me all the time. Ditto.
Childcare is crappy becauase they’ve got you by the balls. But, I would expect to be getting exactly what I signed up for and am paying for. Period.
I agree that O should be with older kids rather than younger. With the older group the day is more constructive because 2 yr olds can’t sit and do things the 3’s and 4’s can. The crafts, the planting flowers, the songs, etc, etc. At Owen’s daycare, nothing turns me off having kids more than that toddler room of screaming kids. In the older room, with older 3’s to school age, the atmosphere is wonderful. Quiet play, puzzels, train sets, dressup clothes, big lego blocks, on and on the toys. It’s been wonderful. The switch here comes when they grow out of toddlerhood and become boys.
But anyhoo, I don’t need to convince you of that. Just to talk to that director and get him what they said they would offer.
(and stop feeling guilty, go work that brain of yours)
July 5th, 2009 at 1:14 am
That is really awful and I can feel the pain in your words. My experience has been that these things often press themselves out, so I am hoping that the school does come through with some more 3 year olds.
July 6th, 2009 at 7:23 am
I think you’ve got great instincts and I would go for the meeting with the school if you can. I don’t think you are being precious at all.
July 6th, 2009 at 11:37 am
Oh, God. I’m cringing because I don’t want to minimize your feelings, your pain. But I have quite a few parenting years behind me at this point, and I have found that every time I’ve agonized over a decision — particularly one that went against what I thought was best for my kid, as when one or the other got the teacher I DIDN’T want for him — later I’ve realized that it ended up working out well enough. That our kids are amazingly flexible and resilient and will extract the best from any situation.
That said, I don’t think it would hurt to have a meeting with the school. I would have done so.
July 6th, 2009 at 11:37 am
Hey. I don’t think you should back down. If they told you he would be with kids his age, then he should be with kids his age. 3-yr-olds tend to go through a baby/toddler-adverse stage so it really is precisely the wrong time to be putting him with his juniors. By the time he’s 4, the nurturing bug may kick in–but not now.
Do they even have another room he could be switched too? Is that even on the radar? If they don’t, then I don’t know what they can do for you b/c they have likely maxed out their teacher/child quota and it’s not as if they can take spots from other parents in order to open up spots for older kids. If there isn’t another room he can go to, then the best they can offer you is an apology, a refund and priority placement for September.
I also have another question. What will things be like in the fall? Is this odd mix of kids just a summer thing? I know that my M is currently in a class with 4-8 yr olds b/c that’s how summer programming plays out. In fall, she’ll be back with 4-5 yr olds exclusively. Having the older kids around has been a boon to her. I know that I wouldn’t be saying the same thing if she were suddenly in a room exclusively with younger kids.
I know that 8 wks seems like a long time but if things are going to change in the fall, I wouldn’t sweat it too much. B/c your job starts in August, you can use July to ramp him up to the experience (so many of us have had to eat day care fees to save a spot for later) and what with so many kids and teachers being on vacation throughout the summer, no matter what his situation there will be chaos in his life.
What is so unfortunate in all of this is that this will be his first impression of the school and first impressions have such a lasting impact at O’s age–or maybe my daughter simply inherited my grudge-bearing ways and O will be able to get over things just fine.
OK, I think that’s my two cents worth. You know that I love you dearly b/c 1.) I came out of summer retirement to comment on this and 2.) you actually got me talking about initial forays into day care–a topic that, along with breastfeeding, has left so many scars in my own psyche I am usually reluctant to discuss with others for fear of tainting the world with my own poison.
Good luck with it all, bon. My heart is in my throat for you.
July 6th, 2009 at 12:06 pm
I was beyond fortunate w/child care. I only worked 4 days a week but my sister took care of my son two days and the preschool was on the campus of the church I worked at. I could walk across campus and take a peek at him if I wanted. The classes were set by peer group and it was just not anything I had to think about too much.
Now, b/c my children are older (9 & 17), I will throw my opinion hat into the ring with Slouchy. Although I did not have the issues w/childcare to contend with, I did have a very challenging son. He was somewhat mercurial in nature. Finding the right discipline for him was hard. I agonized over the right decisions for him. Looking back, I don’t think I would agonize any less over the decisions but I know now that it all ended up okay in the end. So, I think O will be okay whether you leave him in the situation for awhile or whether you change his situation.
BUT, I do make that comment also believing that the people who know what is best for a child is usually the parent. Will a few weeks before more threes come along be a trial that O will deal with or will it just be too much for him right now? You guys know him best and will work through the combination of his needs and your circumstances to come up with the right solution.
July 6th, 2009 at 12:08 pm
Please ignore my problems with subject/verb tense agreement. I JUST woke up… at least, that is what I am blaming it one this time.
July 6th, 2009 at 2:15 pm
i’m pretty sure he’ll be okay in the long run, too, like i said. he’s an adaptable kid, and yep, it appears that this situation is supposed to be only short-term.
however.
it was also supposed to be a peer group. we explicitly chose it – and turned down other options, including leaving behind one we were pretty happy with – because we wanted a peer group. we moved NOW – and are thus paying twice as much as we were before, because the new school only takes f/t kids – b/c we wanted him to have the peer group now.
and so i feel bad because he’s confused, though we’re working with him on strategies for socializing with the much younger and much older kids, and i feel bad b/c i could have just had him at home this month.
more, my trust in the idea of having an open dialogue with the school is damaged, as we end up feeling treated like a number, like “ah, he’ll be fine.” it’s not that i think he won’t be, it’s that for an effective relationship, some part of that giving over to them and their system needs to come from us, as parents, not be thrust on us. and as of last week they were NOT offering what we signed up for, and should have informed me. or at least owned that and said sorry rather than “we made this change and it may not work but have to learn from our mistakes” when i – with trepidation – confronted them on the point.
so partly, i’m feeling uncomfortable with that…and partly just, even if this disparity of ages only exists for the summer, that yes in ten years it’ll have no longterm impact but at the same time it was not a necessary decision to put him in care right now and thus it should be what it promised it would be. if i were putting an older child in summer camp, yes it’d only be for a summer, but i’d still care that it was a remotely reasonable fit and what the camp said it would be.
July 6th, 2009 at 3:50 pm
The preschool is definitely out of order on this. Absolutely.
Again, I was spoiled because I knew the preschool director, I knew the elementary school vice-principal. I would definitely have gotten a better response than the metaphorical pat on the head.
I saw this documentary on the INSANE preschool enrollment process in New York City. It was clear that the preschools knew they didn’t have to make any changes because they were in the position to accept or reject hundreds of applicants.
I wonder if your preschool, while not turning away so many, knows that if you aren’t happy, they’ll just fill in with another person on the waiting list.
The whole situation does suck regardless, like you say, of what impact this will have on O in ten years.
July 6th, 2009 at 4:08 pm
i was wondering if it’s a summer-time thing as well, as in, is the class still forming? will more kids actually join in as parents realize that they want their kids in *something* for the summer? this sort-of happened to us last fall- we started pnut in a 2 afternoon a week playschool at the Y so she could have the same thing- socialization and play with other kids her own age (and give mama and new bean a break). well we prepped the hell out of her to get her ready for the huge transition of being away from me and it turned out that she was the *only kid* in the class!!! for the first week!! two teachers!! one pnut!! it was ridiculous- we didn’t know what to do. her teachers suggested we switch her to the 3 afternoon a week class where there were four kids her age- it cost more, of course, and was one extra day w/o me- but we tried it. we pay by the month, and my husband and i decided that the worst thing that could happen is she would hate it and we’d take her out and lose one months tuition. she ended up loving it and it worked for us.
however…she was just 3 last fall when she started (she turns 4 next week) and she was in a class that had 3 and 4 year olds and a few turning five through the year. the kids her age were a good match, but the older ones (as a pp mentioned) have that social ability to be cruel- and she cried and cried to us for weeks about a girl who was mean to her. we worked with her, talked to the teachers and some other kids parents to figure it all out, and by the end of the year they were friends. but still. my heart broke for her.
her class grew in size as the year went on- from five kids (awesome!) to about 13? it got crazy- but now it is “summer camp school” and there are many new kids and lots of old kids are gone. she ended up being closest friends with the original five, of which she is the only one left this summer. anyway, my point is i can’t picture her with younger ones, but 3/4 would have been right last year, and 4/5 would be right now. it worked to have her with a mixed class, but she was almost the youngest with olders and she was fine- a few bumps here and there, but fine. and honestly, if she were two i wouldn’t want 3 and 4 year olds in with *her*- for he sake.
in the US, in nyc we have federally funded “UPK” which is universal pre-kindergarten, this fall starts for all 2005 babies- pnut, etc.- and we have her enrolled in a wonderful public school close by that i believe i have sold my soul for the opportunity to be in (normally you go to your zoned school- ours is terrible- this one is out of zone and district so i have no idea how we charmed fate to get in it). my point is by 4/5 you don’t have a choice for age, all the kids are together w/ their birth year peers.
sigh. this is tough. i would keep asking the teachers/director when the new kids are coming, are there *any* other threes in the building? emphasize your desire for peer interaction for oscar, and your sense that this is not a good fit yet, and perhaps it would be better in the fall.
good luck and congrats on the new job- that is just wonderful!
July 6th, 2009 at 9:41 pm
they may be the *real* professionals but I’ve been doing my thang for about 17 years now and despise having three year olds mixed with the two year olds. The 2’s get trampled and the 3’s don’t get any learnin’. There is such a huge learning gap. But here’s hoping, cause they do have their ece degrees and all that. P’
July 7th, 2009 at 2:07 am
You should ask for a discount. They didn’t deliver the service they promised, so you deserve compensation. At the least they should pro-rate you for a week next month. (Is that an American way of looking at it? : )
My daughter has been in the same daycare since she was just-3. Only 10 kids attend this daycare; they range in age from 2-5. So she started as one of the youngest and now that she’s 5, she’s the oldest by more than a year. It may turn out to have been the wrong decision — to keep her there with the younger kids — but, who knows. She’s my 2nd and she’s pretty fierce, so I worry about her less.
July 7th, 2009 at 2:15 am
For the record federally funded pre-k is not available throughout the US. In fact I didn’t know it was available anywhere in the US. Lucky New Yorkers.
July 7th, 2009 at 2:23 am
I looked it up and it’s not federally-funded, it’s state-funded. So.
I’ll be quiet now!
July 7th, 2009 at 2:29 am
I love this post. I’ve been teaching for ten years and let me tell you, more parents need to pay this close attention. BE ‘that parent’ because those parents are the ones whose children get taken care of, the way they deserve.
July 7th, 2009 at 4:45 am
How frustrating! I can’t imagine how annoyed I’d be. I hope they’re telling the truth and he’ll get some better playmates next week.
July 7th, 2009 at 8:48 am
Well. We had a similar problem when Isaac was still in full time daycare. The classrooms in that building were sorted by age only; there were no adjustments made for children developing at different speeds. At the risk of sounding like one of “those” parents, he is very verbally advanced and has been from an early age; he prefers the company of kids just a bit older than himself because he finds it easier to talk and interact with them.
Every time his six month older classmates were moved up to the next room, we would suffer through months of a sad boy; he got to play with his particular friends during afternoon free play, but most of his day was spent with kids he couldn’t really interact with in any meaningful way. He asked me every day when he’d be moving up to the next room. Even the teachers admitted that he should be moved up early. The director of the centre refused to bend despite several meetings, and this played a major role in my eventual decision to try and work from home rather than keeping Isaac in daycare (and maybe having the same issues with James).
This is a long rambling diatribe without any useful advice in it, but let me say this – give it a little time and see how O (and you & Dave) adjust. If he still seems unhappy and the school is unwilling or unable to address it, be wary. How they handle your very legitimate concerns will tell you a lot about how they will respond to any future issues with O’s care.
Good luck.
July 7th, 2009 at 9:44 am
so. another girl who is three did start yesterday. and the one other girl in the class who’s a 2006 baby (six months younger) may not be able to talk much but she does like to roar like a dinosaur – her mom told me that in the parking lot, and i told O, and he invited her to play. so…baby steps.
i plan to do pickup a little early tomorrow afternoon, after he’s been there a week, and check out the classroom for some age-appropriate adjustments and gauge whether the fit seems better. i’m hoping it does, as – like i think i mentioned – both the teachers and the location are great and we’d like this to work out.
if not, i think i’ve found a day home sitter for Posey where it so happens a lot of O’s friends from babyhood are still going. so if we pull him we could put the two of them together in one spot and he’d still have a larger peer group than he does now. nice to feel like we have some options, at least.
July 7th, 2009 at 11:26 am
Ah, good to hear it’s already looking up, and that you’ve got a viable alternative if things don’t continue to improve.
It is really hard with childcare to know when to say something and when to be quiet and roll with it – even little things about how family/friends babysit, let alone how ‘professionals’ run their childcare business. I had an issue with our childcare when the baby started this year, and if I wasn’t already so pleased with how they had dealt with our toddler I would have left over it. Instead, I wrote a detailed email to the person directly responsible, specifically outlining what I liked about their care as well as my concerns and how I expected them to be addressed, and then followed it up with a good conversation. For me, it helps to write it first, as sometimes I get a bit overly emotional when it comes to talking about any concerns regarding my children, and I didn’t want to do something foolish (like burst into tears or be alienatingly critical of the carers).
I think it is important to notify the center of your issues, if for no other reason than to provide them with the opportunity to respond well and restore your faith in them. Plus, if they don’t have a good enough response then you really will have a clear indication about what to do. It is also being a good customer – perhaps they’ve unintentionally upset others, too, with similar instances of poor communication – by telling them you’re giving them important information on how to make their business even better.
July 7th, 2009 at 12:03 pm
I’ve long come to the conclusion that this mothering lark is one conitnuous guilt trip where you feel damned if you do, damned if you don’t. We’ve been really lucky, deliberately buying a house which would mean that our childcare needs (until the kids started school) would be covered by my parents, with some time spent in a nursery to a) give my parents a break and b) allow my kids to develop. We are very appreciative of how lucky we are to have my parents helping out both for our kids having an amazing relationship with their grandparents and financially.
Good luck with it – sounds like progress is being made. Did I miss the news about a new job?? If so, huge congratulations!!
July 7th, 2009 at 12:05 pm
“and i think a little coil in my heart came unsprung and did a whirlibird around in my chest cavity, tearing flesh as it went.”
Wow! Your ability to describe this journey astounds me. For me it was the separation anxiety we suffered at when we started care at 13mos. Unfortunately, changes just keep coming. Thankfully most experiences are much easier on our hearts.
That surprise would have shaken me dreadflly too. I am so sorry this has taken away from your excitement at landing that job. It’s awful. And they handled it horrendously (sp?). I am glad however, that you are still willing to give it a little time.
Our care situation: my son just turned 4. His daycare is good. He is in 3-5 year mix. 75% are leaving for kindergarden this summer. They are all getting “good-bye” books. He keeps asking me when his last day is going to be. I may stage a party for the meager few who are staying…
July 8th, 2009 at 1:43 am
Congratulations on the job and glad to see your comment that you’ve found a place for Posey too. Good luck with the school shaping up for O. We put Q-ster in preschool for exactly that socialization opportunity, so I understand how frustrating it would be to find that he might not be getting it.
July 8th, 2009 at 11:20 pm
God, that sounds rough. I hope it pulls together.
I had a nanny for a while, until the girl was old enough for the daycare I wanted to use. She then went there for three years, and it was awesomely wonderful. Really, a terrific experience.