Mon 16 Aug 2010
the best minds of my generation, naked
Posted by bon under milestone stuff, social media meta stuff, writing stuff
[41] Comments
i always wanted to be a Beat, a bohemian.
instead, suddenly i find myself in the Business section of the bookstore, just an aisle over from Philosophy.
i hunker down, intent, studying the titles on the shelves with the rabid eyes of a shark looking to game the casino. i am giving myself a personal, experiential education in How To Maybe Write a Bestseller About Ideas and Social Media. go hard or go home, they say where i’m from.
i has me a literary agent.
i pinch myself.
all these years of dreaming of being discovered for my sizzling cool. instead, i stoop in the Business aisle, plotting the story of self as brand in the world of social media. a dissertation and a trade book. book first. with capital letters, cold hard ambition you can lay out on a table like a cadaver and dissect.
it is the story of how people with my artsy-fartsy prejudices and my humanities degrees and my bohemian posturings are – thanks to the way social media works – ending up in the Business section of the bookstore. it is also the story of how business itself is – for the same reasons inverted – becoming more literary and humanities-focused in its discourse and processes. the unholy marriage of never the twain shall meet, indeed.
it is, in the end, the story of the reputational and relational economy of the digital.
it is the story of brand as a personal rather than a corporate attribute; as a brave new world of identity. brand is not the sell, nor is it without soul. i LOVE this shit.
Allen Ginsberg, i think, would wink at me. or maybe hoist himself up on a soapbox and rail, soliloquize, erase me with the scope of his supermarket excursions. i bow to his shadow in either case, and smile.
i feel like Alice down the rabbit hole. you see that vial labelled Drink Me? hand it over.
***
i want help, though.
it’s a shameless kind of want, the same kind of shameless i always imagined would see me perched with my folk guitar outside some far-flung library strumming Dylan songs, the really long ones, with my guitar case with the embroidered Grateful Dead bears open for donations and a handwritten sign, If you Fear Change, leave it here. life takes you funny places.
instead i sit here in my hometown hoping you’ll tell me stories…yours. or those you think might resonate. i need a few case studies, poster children whose selves and brands i can explore and dissect.
i want to know, in these stories, about how the so-called real and the online self. about how you and your virtual identity get along. i want to know if the lines between them have changed for you, over the time you’ve spent engaging online.
you don’t need to be a Big Deal to tell me about your “brand” and yourself. you don’t need to like the idea of brand at all. in fact, i might like it a lot if you didn’t.
you can email me, if you want, or leave as many comments here as you want. i may pry further. i may come and park myself on your floor and read your virtual Tarot cards like some social media fortune teller, promising the inevitable dark, handsome stranger and a future of millions of Twitter followers. i may offer my effusive thanks in the acknowledgements of something printed on paper, someday, knock wood. that something may be a Ph.D thesis or a tome you can buy on Amazon and in the Business aisles of better bookstores, or both.
either way. i am sitting, waiting for the story hour to begin.
all those years i dragged myself through Korean and Slovak and Turkish streets at dawn not looking for an angry fix but another drink, a smoke, a conversation to be in, arms or words there was something transcendental out there burning for the ancient heavenly connection, i knew it, i saw it in tatters and hollowed eyes and tenement roofs illuminated. but in the end, i came home and found it here, in the ether.
and so i laugh and burn my beret, and ask what you think it means to be a self in the world of social media?
***
edited to add: if not your story, whose? who should i be tracking down to explore success in social media and ways it intersects with personal identity? who’s your idea of an exceptional, or reluctant, or conflicted, or interesting “brand”? even if they’d never use the word themselves? and who or what (feel free to email rather than comment, as you wish) make up the benighted practices reinforcing the concept of personal branding as some kind of Amway Cult of Personality? all recommendations gratefully received.
i might even buy you a beer to keep you talking.
41 Responses to “ the best minds of my generation, naked ”
Comments:
Leave a Reply
Trackbacks & Pingbacks:
-
Trackback from jimgroom (Jim Groom)
August 17th, 2010 at 1:54 am
@pumpkiny @MissShuganah Oh yeah, the link [link to post] -
Trackback from BonStewart (Bonnie Stewart)
August 17th, 2010 at 2:01 am
help wanted. square seeks stories. naked stories. [link to post] -
Trackback from davecormier (dave cormier)
August 17th, 2010 at 2:02 am
I heard that @jimgroom was too scared to tell @bonstewart his brand story. [link to post]




August 16th, 2010 at 11:24 pm
I don’t see you as a brand, I see you as a writer. I would buy your book to read, no – to soak in your words.
I don’t have to be on your actual website to see your icons, your ads, your layout, your buttons – you are a blogger I love in my feed reader. Not eye candy. Not a brand.
Congratulations on your agent. I hope that they can craft your career to be successful in the business aisle. You have already staked your claim in the literary aisle.
August 16th, 2010 at 11:37 pm
“you don’t need to be a Big Deal to tell me about your “brand” and yourself. you don’t need to like the idea of brand at all. in fact, i might like it a lot if you didn’t.”
Fine. You asked for it.
I have an MBA, so I understand the business concept of branding. But I do NOT like the idea of personal branding. At all. Yes, I know we all “sell” ourselves everyday. And I know we can choose to portray ourselves in any number of ways online. But I seek Truth – capital T – about myself and others online and off, so the kind of manipulation “personal branding” conjures makes me recoil.
I made a fake online persona once. In college. On a MUD. It was a resounding FAILURE.
This distaste for the concept of personal branding as I understand it (which is probably so very limited) probably relates to the reasons why, though I LOVE the theatre, I could only ever be a bit part actress. If it’s silly or outrageous or not-even-remotely-me, I could play it. Maybe. But something serious yet FAR from the real me? No way – wouldn’t do it. What if someone thought that was the real me?!
Like…stage kissing someone? acting like a kiss is no big deal? faking passion? nope. Have lots of respect for actors and actresses that make it all real; LOVE and revere imagination and fantasy, but it’s just not something with which I personally am comfortable.
I have probably just totally hijacked your comments section with a huge, lengthy, irrelevant comment. But you did ask for it. (-:
August 16th, 2010 at 11:38 pm
Congratulations! I think it’s awesome you have a book deal and as a former economist, hey, the business section is not so terrible.
I wish I could help you out, but I don’t think I have a brand. My little blog is pretty quiet. The best I can come up with is that I will be having a conversation with friends, and they will say “Oh yeah! I read about that on your blog!” That’s kind of funny.
August 17th, 2010 at 12:22 am
you could try CJane!
August 17th, 2010 at 1:04 am
Hi, Bon,
I echo Maggie May with CJane – also her sister’s blog nieniedialogues.com.
These blogs also provide an interesting insight into the whole issue of commenting on blogs – CJane allows comments and NieNie has disabled that feature. NieNie’s readers will sometimes use CJane’s blog to comment about something NieNie wrote. How important is it that readers are able to comment and provide feedback to a blogger? Does it make a difference to the reader if the comments are public, or is it enough to provide an e-mail where the reader can comment privately to the blogger?
August 17th, 2010 at 1:07 am
I’m talking next weekend at a writers festival here in Australia about “The Author as ‘Brand’” – which means, presumably, that people consider me as one.
If that is so, I feel like I’ve applied a mud mask that is still waiting to dry, but everyone is seeing the cast it has already made.
August 17th, 2010 at 1:15 am
When I think about brand I still get kinda nauseous, it is really the borrowing of the terms from marketing and business and sloppily grafting them on a major shift in identity and communication that seems to reduce them to the lowest possible denominator.
With that said, i was part of a really interesting seminar last year called Digital Whitman, which was part of a larger course across 5 campuses called Looking for Whitman. And what struck me over the course of the semester was the way we bgan to see, think, and imagine Whitman as not only multivalent and between and betwixt identities, but also as a kind of brand that he himself fostered. An American original, a rough, a b’hoy, a gay, and a man’s man. He was everything all at once, and in that he was beautifully complex, he was branding an idea both for and against consumerism, both for an against imperialism, both for and against homosexuality. He weaved himself in the interstices, he used words to free us from the implication that he was less than we thought. And when you talk about Gnsberg above, I can’t help but hear him in the Grocery Aisle: “Who killed the pork chops? What price bananas? Are you my Angel?”
Which brings me to Delillo, and the apocalyptic vision of that same supermarket not thirty years later have become “very rich in magic and dread; it’s a kind of church. Perhaps the supermarket tabloids are the richest material of all, closest to the spirit of the book. They ask profoundly important questions about death, the afterlife, God, worlds and space, yet they exist in an almost Pop Art atmosphere.’
I’m not sure rebranding brand as digital identity changes anything really, and Im also not so sure Delillo is wrong about the Pop Art way we conduct the business of art on the internet—but I do feel like more and more we have let the supermarket become the arcade of our flourescent-lighted ideas, both well-stocked but predictable, the more we understand the deeply complex and horrific idea of identity as a product. There are implicatiosn there, real and dangerous one’s, I mean look at this clip from the documentary on Hunter S. Thompson to get a sense of where his idea of an identity, persona, brand took him:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=r31hV_BPFf0
There is a story of branding that gets to the heart of the horror of it, when brand is less than that, it seems less than valuable.
August 17th, 2010 at 2:20 am
I find brands really interesting and will totally buy your book!
I don’t have a big blog presence by choice – my life is pretty full and I’m content exchanging stories with other bloggers who come by and have become friends.
I did choose a “persona” that I thought could grow with me in case I decide to branch out someday. That’s why I’m Lady M, and not “So and so’s Mommy,” which is what several of my friends chose.
I also chose a domain name (giving myself a promotion with http://www.Empress-M) with bigger ambitions too, even though I’m not doing anything with it now.
I was/am a dance instructor and director and am very conscious of my brand in that arena. Every class, every performance, choreography, costume, interaction with hiring managers or audience – all of that reflected on me, on my brand, and its value. It’s not much a stretch to see my online brand as a similar thing.
I think people are sometimes uncomfortable with associating a business-type label with themselves, which I understand for personal or life bloggers. However, if you want to do business-type transactions, that’s what you need. If you prefer to stay personal, there’s no need to present a unified brand.
Sorry for the long comment! Let me know if there’s anything else on which you’d like to chat.
August 17th, 2010 at 2:22 am
I do social media ALL WRONG.
you do need to get to know nie nie, she is amazing.
August 17th, 2010 at 8:57 am
Hi Bon and pardon the familiarity:
I began reading “you” months (years?) ago, your brand essay was the BEST and have re-read many times.
Brand is what it is in 2010 like it or not. Forward thinking will win out.
Keep writing! Your voice is needed.
Linda PS Learned of Nie from an article in the NY Times after her plane accident. Tough stuff, interesting your readers cite her and her sister CJane.
August 17th, 2010 at 9:03 am
CJane and NieNie and Hunter S Thompson and DeLillo. i don’t know if those sisters realize the company they keep. :)
thanks for the ideas, and the feedback, everybody. it’s true, Jim…i think we do conduct art in a pop art manner on the internet. and things get lost. the focus on what and how things get lost in the ethos of social media was actually where this whole exploration began. i’m not actually a brand booster: i want to figure this out. and i call it brand, this relational, reputational identity, as a cautionary tale – i think we forget the economics of the social media environment at our peril. none of us exist outside of it.
Flutter, i think we all do social media all wrong. that’s the odd thing. everyone who does anything beautiful seems to be doing it wrong according to the business & SEO manuals. and yet it works. those are the things that interest me. :)
August 17th, 2010 at 9:32 am
This is all very interesting, Bon. My online life has been highly compartmentalized until just recently. I had e-mail relationships with some relatives & friends. I had the online support network I created for myself after my daughter was stillborn (message boards & a private e-mail list), & then the small but close-knit group of women I found to help me transition from infertility treatments to childfree living (message boards)(to compensate for the lack of support I was getting “in real life”). More message boards to feed my scrapbooking interests, since few of my “real life” friends found that interesting. And I started my blog about three years ago as an extension of my pregnancy loss/infertility/childless not by choice persona. Very few people IRL know about my blog & I would kind of like to keep it that way.
Never the twain did meet, until just recently, when I joined Facebook. I have “friends” from all these different facets of my life on there. So far, so good, but it still makes me a little leery at times.
August 17th, 2010 at 9:59 am
I just emailed you, but I wanted to add congratulations on the agent.
August 17th, 2010 at 10:43 am
I feel really old when I read these things. I have no real idea what any of this means and I still blog for myself…and I generally steer away from reading blogs where I feel like I’m being sold something that’s too polished and presented on a silver platter. There’s enough plastic crap out there…tabloids, sitcoms, pop music…I like my blogs to be a little more real.
August 17th, 2010 at 11:49 am
Cool news! Congratulations. You’ll bring a refreshing burst of delicious to the business section.
I love books that mix great writing with thoughtful analysis. I’d buy it in a second.
August 17th, 2010 at 11:52 am
Geez I take a wee break and come back and EVERYONE has a book. Do I need a book? Did I miss something? (Does my boring PhD parked in a vault somewhere count?)
I was going to say the problem with branding personalities is that people change. So suddenly you’ve bought into the brand and boom, New Coke. Except the person can’t just change the recipe because something has happened to them that’s irreversible.
But then I realize writers brand themselves all the time, especially the Dan Browns and Ann Rices and serial writers of the world. Maybe they change as people, but they’ve managed to compartmentalize the writer so it doesn’t really? (I confess to not reading these authors v. much so I don’t know if their writing “evolves” but from the outside it doesn’t seem to much. I gather that’s in fact why people buy them.) And then there are people like Madonna who is a genius at re-inventing herself and people seem to buy in every time.
I take it Brand is the new Black? Can I just pick one up at H&M and be done with it?
August 17th, 2010 at 11:58 am
Hi, Bon,
I realize upon rereading my comment that I did not really clarify why I would insert NieNie and CJane into comments about “brand.”
Both sisters have unusual, and apparently, widely recognized senses of style, both personal and in home decorating. Their blogs often feature pictures of same, which results at times in hundreds of questions on CJane’s blog enquiring about the source of certain items because their readers wish to purchase them. So much so, that CJane created another blog called “Dear CJane, Where Did You Get…?”
I’m not sure if the sisters started out with that aim in mind, but their style of clothing, jewellery, art, home decorating, etc., has a certain indentifiable look to it that could be termed the “Clark Sisters Brand.”
Then of course, there is the whole issue of their religion. They are members of the Church of Latter Day Saints, and their blogs reflect those teachings openly. Nie even sends copies of the the Book of Mormon to whoever requests one. Can religion be part of a “brand?”
I was remiss as well in my previous e-mail in not congratulating you on your wonderful news. You are my favourite blogger, bar none. I appreciate the generosity and beauty of your world view, and admire how you can extrapolate a common man experience from a specific incidence in your own life.
August 17th, 2010 at 12:08 pm
I’m interested in my brand as a burn on the charred flesh of people’s minds and how that implies permanence when the truth of identity is that it’s so damn fluidly impermanent. So I toy with that. That’s the way I play. “He’s an internet bully.” “He’s really just a softy.” And all kinds of identities in between. I try to leave contradictory scars and the vision people have of me is always about their predisposition to be branded a particular way. I struggle with that. I want to say: Look! Identity! We’re so confusing and complex and rich! But your audience likes to have a handle on you – their handle – because it’s easier, I suppose.
I’m more comfortable now with the fact that I can’t escape the self as a brand. But it remains a mission of mine to hack away at the notion of the self as unified, exploring its splinters, and continuing to pitch my brand as a choir of contradictory brands, fragments of acceptable AND excluded selves, each worthy of their day in the sun and chance to cause a scar.
August 17th, 2010 at 1:57 pm
I think I’m too shy and vulnerable to do this here. (Hey, I’m a guy, I’m supposed to be emotionally weird.) Maybe privately.
August 17th, 2010 at 2:08 pm
it’s interesting…Catherine, i feel the same as you about blogs, and the rest of my entertainment/communications/reading. i don’t get much out of the packaged pleasant. but i don’t think brand is only the purview of the plastic, not at all. like BHJ says above, HE has a brand. and plastic perfection definitely ain’t it. coolness is a brand stance. post-hip is a brand stance. no brand is a brand stance. brand is just a form of social positioning.
i think Beat was a brand, though the Beats would have blown smoke in my face for saying so. but in a sense there’s transcendentalism in my own position on brand, which entertains me and will require more thought.
Tash, you’re right…brand is totally the new black. which, incidentally, is a great subtitle.
i think brand has always been changeable: the biggest trick that the PR machines have played on 20th/21st century culture was making us buy into the idea that brand was some clunky plastic thing, preserve of cheap consumerism and bad car salesmen.
i just said to @Neilochka on twitter: “if you write about life, your brand is the narrative arc of your life, and your attitude toward it.” it’s whatever people expect of you. New Coke aside, people are actually accustomed to their expectations changing over time.
August 17th, 2010 at 2:10 pm
Some days I think social media saved my mind, and others I think it’s some sort of manifestation of a multiple personality disorder. Maybe because the blog I’ve poured the most energy into was and is so largely about grief – the kind of grief that makes people uncomfortable, that isn’t okay to discuss at work, that embarrasses family and friends – maybe because of this I feel like the “self” I show online is almost a secret identity. As of yet, no brand that I can identify, and no conscious attempt to create one.
I’d recommend taking a look at the vlogbrothers, John Green (popular YA author) and his brother, Hank. They have their own channel on YouTube, and what began as a project to communicate only through videos for a year has turned into a pretty big online community.
August 17th, 2010 at 7:36 pm
You know I’m your biggest fan. I love your writing. I love your thinking. I am so happy about your success. But I also know I can’t wait until this book comes out so I can review it on my blog and rip the shreds out of this whole branding concept. I’m already giving this book one star on Amazon. Start that novel. I’m putting the emoticon here to protect myself, but you know the truth. :)
Your good blogging friend, and congratulations.
P.S. — Aw, crap. I hate it because it exists. It’s a lost cause. Branding wins.
August 17th, 2010 at 8:02 pm
brand.
it makes me want to clamp my mouth shut and walk away.
but maybe that’s my brand.
August 17th, 2010 at 8:03 pm
oh, and congratulations.
August 17th, 2010 at 11:46 pm
p.s. i don’t mean walk away from YOU. never that. just from the word. :)
August 18th, 2010 at 2:01 am
Blogher changed my perception of bloggers so much…. Not in a bad way. Seeing larger than life bloggers behave in person like people not brands was interesting. It oddly enough made me want to blog more and better whatever that means for me.
And I honestly don’t care what you write because it is all good. And I have feeling you will be synthesizing something from a nothing. Not that brand is nothing but the Beats could never have imagined this. Could they?
And YAY for your name on the cover. Said it before but #abouttime
August 18th, 2010 at 4:48 pm
I offer:
The Sartorialist! I am a little obsessed and think he needs to be in your book. How his non-commercial work affects his commercial life and how the non commercial has evolved…is it more personal now? Less? Is fashion moving with the people on the streets or are they moving with fashion and how much has he changed that?
And Booksnob who didn’t love post graduate life, but loved books and is now moving to New York for a post grad business degree…Where was the line between non-profit, literature, and a new life?
I might need a dictionary of the new-e.lexicon to really understand your book, though. I am afraid of the jargon. It crumples my brain. Or makes me smarter. Or at least makes me sound smarter when I can parrot it.Either way, thinking about social networking and talking about it has created some new weird words that aren’t entirely defined yet in my internal dictionary. : )
August 18th, 2010 at 8:19 pm
thanks, Traci, for those suggestions. i haven’t been reading the Sartorialist but i am jealous of his handle already. :)
thanks to everybody. there are at least ten other people who sent email input so i have a fabulous first list of narratives to scrounge through…i’m tickled and excited and overwhelmed.
and the twitter salon that @Neilocha @AureliaCotta @PlainlySarah and @ThreeandHolding and i had this morning on the subject was one of the most interesting ideas conversations i’ve had in years. am grateful for those of you holding up mirrors to help me deepen what i see and those of you holding up red cards saying No Way! Get this out of here!
it’s a cultural phenomenon i’m looking to track – the story of how the dichotomy that’s existed between an ethos of humanism and an ethos of consumerism is blending. it may well be to the detriment of both, and certainly those of us traditionally aligned with the humanist camp tend to think so, vehemently. yet i see possibility.
the fact that i have the space here to work out that possibility in company with other social media users is a great gift. you blow my mind. :)
August 18th, 2010 at 9:00 pm
What about the folks that were “in the beginning” and now are gone? Anyone else remember Jennicam? An idea became a concept became a business became an intrusion became a memory?
And I think branding is about resonance; creating an identity for something (product,concept,person) that becomes familiar and comfortable. That we pull into our identity and accept more readily because of that comfort.
August 18th, 2010 at 11:34 pm
Hey Bon,
I don’t know if I can be of assistance. I’m at an interesting cross roads with blogging. See I started blogging in 2004. My blog audience grew organically. Then I got a job writing at ParentDish.com. I was a writer/editor by trade, but was working in book publishing after my son was born and it was nice to be recognized as a writer without really submitting a resume.
My audience and my traffic grew immensely during that period. I would get lovely letters from women saying that I inspired them to blog. I had readers from all around the world.
Then I got an editor’s job and the media world had changed. Social media was important, though most companies were unsure of how to implement it or deal with it. My persona on my personal blog (dark, funny, edgy, raw) was not one I could project in my day job.
When they asked me to start a blog at work, I had to reevaluate my writing style. Could I talk about my life in looser terms? Could I do it without cussing?
I could no longer just dump everything onto the page on my personal blog either. Industry peers were finding me. My colleagues were reading. I began to censor myself at my favourite clearinghouse too.
I’ve come to terms with both my online faces, the sweet and the sour. I’ve made new guidelines for myself as to what I’m willing to share (to the joy of my husband). I’m not blogging for notoriety in either place; one pays the bills so that I can be a bit more free to play with words at the other.
It’s more complex than this explanation obviously. There’s Twitter and Facebook to contend with. Whom do I let in and where? Can I avoid exploiting my children when I’m a mom-genre writer and a semi-public figure? Can I write from the soul and avoid pissing off my friends and family?
This is what I struggle with. There are no perfect answers, only a place of moderate discomfort that I shrug off every now and then.
Congrats on your book! You’re gonna rock it.
August 19th, 2010 at 1:21 am
Oh, congratulations! Although, I’m with Neil. Personal branding, blah. I want your first novel. You can probably make personal branding interesting though.
I cling to my romantic view of blogging, though BHJ and others have trashed it for me time and time again. I want it to be about seeking connection, about the void that is filled for us all when we speak to someone on a deep level. I want it to be about loneliness and longing for more relationships in our life. Silly me.
August 19th, 2010 at 11:18 am
Blending business and personal in personal brands? I’ve had to do it. Seems to me there are 2 crucial elements.
First, passion. This is the crossover piece of a brand and elemental. Andy Hertzfeld, creator of the Mac OS, said, “You are expected to work out of your passion.” (At Google). What do you prioritize? What qualities suffuse your work and your relationships at work? Chances are good that if you are creative at work you are creative in your personal life.
Two, specialization or distinctiveness. Means being somebody unique doing only certain kinds of things, rather than just anybody doing things for everybody. I started out as a resume writer serving all, evolved into an exec resume writer serving technology folks and writing the “hard” resumes. Was one of hundreds of thousands. Now one of relatively few.
Thanks for the great topic! So important to keep from cheapening personal brands.
August 19th, 2010 at 11:23 am
Anymommy, i completely agree with you. for me, blogging has been about connection and creating a space to speak loneliness and longing and the void…a space for my internal narrative, and a chance – amazingly – to access those of other people.
i don’t think of my blog in market terms.
but i still think it’s a platform withIN a market, no matter how accidentally or haphazardly that platform and brand have evolved, in my case. when you come here, you expect something.
mine isn’t a sales-oriented brand so that something may be fairly open-ended…hopefully a something with a fair amount of scope for me to explore whatever is tickling my mind. from where i sit, i see the blog as being about explorations of identity in this particular cultural time and place, so parenthood and grief and branding all kinda fit the general theme i’m on about.
whereas if i went commercial and started posting Wii giveaways, or tried to “personal brand” a cribchronicles twibbon in some kind of overt market manner, you’d probably turn away. because that’s not what you expect. because it’s not what i DO.
and that’s brand. that’s all. so your brand can totally be about longing and loneliness and connection and making me laugh out loud, which you do. but that doesn’t remove blogging from the larger social media economy, in which reputation and what people expect is a powerful form of capital, whether we want to wield it or not.
August 20th, 2010 at 4:46 pm
About the only thing I can add to this discussion is that in my opinion, setting out to establish a brand is the surest way to turn me off.
Although “authentic” is a buzzword that’s overused to the point of meaninglessness, I find the blogs I seek out are the ones that have the ring of truth to them… a certain integrity of self that speaks to me. Anyone who works too hard to maintain their self-selected brand (whether it’s “bad mommy” or “neurotic writer” or “quirky undiscovered poet”) sets my teeth on edge.
Bottom line for me, I don’t seek out blogs based on a brand image. I find those I like through the recommendations of others, and if the writing interests me I’ll keep coming back.
August 21st, 2010 at 6:12 pm
First of all – congratulations on the agent! Big news, big deal. Very exciting.
Second – I find this fascinating, and I may email you about it since you’re interested in people’s opinions on the topic. I’ve never dared blog my take or even get into too much in comments because I don’t want it to come off wrong. But maybe I’ll shoot you an email….
August 24th, 2010 at 10:55 pm
Never thought much about self-branding on the internet … until people began to ask why I never cook. My husband posts facebook pictures about his cooking quite a lot. So much so that he’s “branded” himself as some sort of super-dad. If I suddenly disappear, suspect one of his old high school girlfriends, who think he’s some sort of domestic dream god.
August 24th, 2010 at 11:04 pm
No brand. My friends were all Softball Players or Cheerleaders and I just kind of did those things without them really scratching the surface. Just like gerbil wrangling or counting the bumps in the sidewalk. Just things you do, you know?
My blog pretty much reflects the way I live – might tell a story here or there, but quite a bit I keep to myself. It’s just that that shit is mine, yo. The important stuff, the things that turn you, I don’t want to share it.
September 14th, 2010 at 9:49 am
Wow – I am so late on this news it’s not funny, but congratulations! I will buy and read anything you write, although I must admit it’s the novel I’m totally hankering for as soon as humanly possible. Which, given the other things you have on your plate, may be quite some time in coming.
As for branding, I might email you my few thoughts on the matter. In fact, if you don’t get an email from me in the next few days remind me I said I’d send you one! :)