Mon 31 Jan 2011
but the earth and sky
Posted by bon under relationship stuff, the home project
[27] Comments
once, i thought we were a matched set of shoes, toes pointing together.
the bloom is off the rose. he is a cowboy boot, i see it now. or maybe a brogue, stitched and sewn in ways that will never match my own. but still i admire the curve of a heel, the shape of something different and curious.
***
he approaches every new thing as if it is the first, the only.
i noticed it first in our early, lazy days, expats with too much time to kill. drinking and smoking and sex are exquisite hobbies, and talking into the night is an art form we perfected. but when a pair only work fifteen hours a week, they are eventually forced back on their resources.
i taught him to play Scrabble.
i thought of Scrabble as a delightful way to share the pleasure of words. i liked to coo over my competitor’s seven-letter accomplishments, work together to see if we could make the board a patchwork of poetry. he read the two-letter-word list from the dictionary and was kicking my ass within a week.
when he takes to something, he goes at it heart and soul, to win. that took me aback, at first: i took it personally, his ethic of competition. i did not grow up with that. but then neither did i grow up with the ethic of self-application, of intentional effort. i did not know that what did not come easy could still be gained.
he has taught me.
***
he is learning guitar.
i grew up a folkie, my Bowie fetish aside. i played dolls to Joan Baez and Kris Kristofferson, branched out to Dylan and Guthrie – father and son – in high school. John Prine was a legacy i inherited from my father and stepmother, Janis Joplin who i wanted to be when i grew up. i knew all the words to everything.
i got my first guitar at almost 23. first Christmas far from home, in a smoky basement apartment on Davie Street in Vancouver. i didn’t even know how to hold it, didn’t know a chord from a carburetor.
it was the first thing in my life i ever worked at.
i played by ear, and from the small book of chords that came with the case. i eked out “Leaving on a Jet Plane” first, with full stops in the singing where i had to change chords. then “Me & Bobby McGee,” a signature Kris/Janis blend that made me puffy with pride. i learned to pluck a string or two for “Wish You Were Here” and “Friend of the Devil,” but that was the apex of my vocation: i never got much past four chords and a simple strum. it never entered my mind to master, just to make a joyful noise. along the way, i taught myself to sing. i found my key, and my voice, and i was happy.
my calluses have faded over the last few years, though two guitars sit in our living room. at Christmas, Oscar’s grandparents bought a wee one for him. it came with an instructional CD, way over his head, but apparently quite entertaining for his father.
because suddenly, he plays.
in a month, Dave has learned things on guitar i never will. he’s working on a fingerpicking riff that sounds remarkably like “Dust in the Wind.” fifteen times or so a day. he’s taking lessons, now.
i do not mind being left in that dust, this time.
my children watch him, and learn that if they work at something, they will get better. i watch him, and pick up my old guitar, and try to catch up.
maybe it will last, this music…my slow plunking a balance to his passion, a reason to keep going. it’s hard to say. i tease him that he is part crow, drawn to the next bit of shiny.
and yet, he is still here.
and we walk together, not matched as i once thought. but maybe better.
***
do you think likeness matters, in a partnership?
27 Responses to “ but the earth and sky ”
Comments:
Leave a Reply
Trackbacks & Pingbacks:
-
Pingback from Tweets that mention but the earth and sky | cribchronicles.com -- Topsy.com
January 31st, 2011 at 1:45 pm[...] This post was mentioned on Twitter by dave cormier and Bonnie Stewart, Bonnie Stewart. Bonnie Stewart said: once i thought we had to be alike. http://cribchronicles.com/2011/01/31/but-the-earth-and-sky/ #thehomeproject [...]





January 31st, 2011 at 10:19 am
I miss the days of “too much time to kill” with my husband. We lived on love and lived in sin for a couple of years. I can almost smell it.
Sometimes I think likeness matters in a partnership [like when I’m so frustrated I could smother the other guy with a pillow, and other times I’m thankful for the radical differences in our relationship.
January 31st, 2011 at 10:55 am
Josh and I are of similar temperaments, but quite different in other ways. Our interests almost never intersect, but that has never been an issue for us.
January 31st, 2011 at 11:42 am
I love this so much! What a beautiful post. When you mentioned Wish You Were Here, it literally brought tears to my eyes – that song is one of my all-time favourites, one that makes me choke up whenever I hear the opening notes.
January 31st, 2011 at 12:20 pm
we intersect in key arenas and in others sit back and marvel at our differences. what is important, i think, is the deep-rooted respect i instinctively feel towards my partner’s perspective. i strive daily to embody this (thanks for the reminder!).
i, too, taught myself to play the guitar to the same degree as you. quite happy with my four chords, i was intensely irritated when my partner picked up the guitar and got better. there he went, applying himself–casually but diligently, a skill set i had never learned. it wasn’t the guitar skills but his ability to engage with something without being fixated, to pursue without blinders on. i was always an all-or-nothing kinda girl and the limitations of this model became glaringly clear as i watched him strumming–and then plucking–away. that was years ago. now he plays for our daughter, learning her favorite songs, and i can’t help but beam.
January 31st, 2011 at 12:35 pm
Lovely, Bon.
And in answer to your question: I hope not, because D and I are as different as two people could be.
January 31st, 2011 at 3:52 pm
Skype message from Dave at work: “cowboy boot, huh?”
January 31st, 2011 at 3:53 pm
I love these weekly posts. They make me both nostalgic and thankful, and it’s fun to reflect on those differences. I’m the musical one in our house, but he can look at anything and figure out how it works. We both have our uses.
January 31st, 2011 at 4:26 pm
I think that you need to be enough alike to communicate on a level playing field so one doesn’t feel as if they’re being talked down to. Other than that, difference seems to be the spice of life. Sometimes you learn to enjoy something because of the other’s interest, other times you get to sit back, smile cheerfully and think “well, isn’t that odd?”
I know that Jody and I are about as different as they come, yet we seem to fit just right :D
January 31st, 2011 at 4:27 pm
If you listed all the things he is interested in I would not believe that he was a man I have spent over 20 years being in love with. And vice versa. We seem to match though.
January 31st, 2011 at 4:29 pm
This post makes me smile – I think appreciating differences is probably as important as anything, and I see so much of that here.
The likeness that really matters is probably the likeness partners build together over time. I read an article once that discussed how being in love with someone eventually changes neural pathways so that the brains of partners become more similar over the years. Every once in a while I’ll say something and N will laugh because he was going to say that exact same thing, and I imagine our brains working to (partially) sync.
January 31st, 2011 at 4:45 pm
We are not a matched pair. I’m the laid-back writer and artist and creative type; he’s an engineer with high energy, high standards, and daily goals to achieve.
We don’t have any common interests or hobbies, don’t like the same books, rarely can agree on a movie to watch together, and have different biorhythms. We agree on how to spend money, how to raise kids, and how to treat other people. For 30 years, that’s been enough.
January 31st, 2011 at 5:27 pm
I’m the jack of all trades, master of none. I tend to act as though my husband’s mastery is some sort of magic trick, or as he likes to ask, “Do you think the instructions came with my dick?” because that’s basically what he has that I have not.
I read an article by neurologist Oliver Sacks describing the effect that being in love has on our perception of our accomplishments. His study showed that people in love believe they are growing because they adopt their partner’s skills as their own and have a difficult time differentiating between sets.
I think we’re very much alike, Tony and I. If it has helped our relationship in any ways, I have taken them for granted, because I only tend to notice when our flaws intersect and magnify, laying bare two stubborn, critical, antisocial people who probably shouldn’t have passed on a double dose of those genes to a pair of kids we hope to parent into reasonably well-adjusted adults.
January 31st, 2011 at 6:09 pm
It matters, if it’s in the right ways. My ex and I were similar in all the ways that were awesome when it’s just the two of you, but eventually, stuff like loving certain records doesn’t hold much water.
My current other, he’s like fire to my water, but the things that matter, our goals and morals and peeves, they align. He has terrible taste in music (mostly) doesn’t like movies and rides a motorbike. But he has a lust for learning that I find unbearably attractive, and a thirst to see what’s over the next hill.
Those are the things that matter, the cores of us.
January 31st, 2011 at 8:06 pm
Erica, you pointed out the piece of this that i think made it worth writing, for me…the appreciating of difference.
that’s new for me. way new. like, i’ve started thinking about it consciously and without aversion in, say, the last, six weeks. ahem.
i grew up thinking that compatibility meant likeness. what did i know? my parents were obvious opposites, and their marriage lasted about twelve seconds. my first husband and i were compatible in tastes – when i read the way Thor puts it, i cringe and squeal “ouch” but that was us – but not alike in personality. whereas, with Dave, i always thought there was some core part of us alike.
lately i’ve been deconstructing the idea of cores at all, and so a lot’s been thrown into relief. and it’s left me noticing strength where i once just saw difference. it’s hard, learning to appreciate what you’ve always feared. but still.
he’s playing that Dust in the Wind riff again.
January 31st, 2011 at 8:19 pm
i find your writing to be intoxicating.
my husband and i have been married for 6 + years but together for 12. the ebbs and flows of a relationship/partnership is something that i can always use more time to reflect on.
thank you for that.
January 31st, 2011 at 10:58 pm
I’m a little jealous about the guitar thing. But I could do that. I think!
My husband has, as a result of him being the stay at home dad, taken over the baking that used to be my sole purview. I’m still not sure how I feel about that, though there’s more bread and pie than there would be if it were in my court.
January 31st, 2011 at 11:06 pm
…yeh, it extends to cooking & baking here too, Maggie. which is not bad. just takes a little getting over myself to realize that so long as i refuse to accurately measure anything, i will remain at a particular plateau, whilst others have more reliable results! ahem.
i like to be surprised by the consistency of my oatmeal in the morning, i tell myself. ;)
January 31st, 2011 at 11:07 pm
…and Nic, thank you.
intoxicating like, say, cheap beer? or a shooter, like?
i think i’m aiming for absinthe. with a lesser hangover. ;)
February 1st, 2011 at 6:07 am
Interesting that you used the shoe analogy. My husband is a great lover of shoes – he can riff for hours on the beauty of a brogue and how many eyelets it should have or the perfect pair of Red Wing tips (or something like that!)His New Year resolution was to be less post modern – or was it more post modern?
We will happily get through box sets together, think the same about films and books, but he’s infinitely more practical than I am. He gets excited about blueprints to a house or how a shutter works, whereas my eyes glaze over when it comes to anything that involves a)maths b)directions and c)left and right. He’s also a better cook than I am – I can say that here because I know he’ll never read it. He hates the internet and twitter!
February 1st, 2011 at 1:16 pm
laughing, DeerBaby. late last night Dave took it into his head to try to explain some mathematical equation to me. then he ran screaming from the room. :)
February 1st, 2011 at 8:25 pm
compatibility matters.
February 2nd, 2011 at 8:35 pm
this is wonderful.
i have guitar gathering dust, as well.
and in terms of game playing? our hubbies would would be well matched. mine has read books about MONOPOLY strategy. i had never bothered to figure out how to mortgage properties. but I had to to keep up!
February 2nd, 2011 at 11:58 pm
Loved this.
We have differences. Lots of ‘em. Heaps, in fact. But there is also a sameness, a certain something. I like that we’re not exactly the same, or there are things around here that would not run smoothly at all.
I remember once reading that a study found that couples who shared the same taste in paintings were more likely to stay together than couples who do not. I think art represents something intrinsic and (for me) inexplicable about what speaks to us, and how we see the world. Couples who have different taste in art, perhaps (I am hypothesising here), have to work a bit harder to explain themselves, not to mention negotiate more often on more trivial things like their decorating, clothing, or other choices in taste. Which need not mean it can’t be done, of course.
Anyway, I mentioned that because I’ve found comfort in the fact that as much as we have changed in different ways over the years, Jag and I invariably gravitate towards the same art. Despite the interests and skills that were already somewhat different and have only become more so, there is still something there that is alike.
February 6th, 2011 at 1:12 am
My best relationship surely comes from the one in which I am the least contrived and blended.
http://motherwoman.blogspot.com/2009/02/ring-of-truth.html
… bottom of the sock drawer mix and match. They don’t have to match.. they have to ‘go’
February 6th, 2011 at 1:00 pm
Lovely, lovely, lovely! I LOVE this series. I am quite different than my hubby but didn’t see it at first. He picked me up for our first date playing Peter Gabriel’s US album many years after its release. Then a friend asked me you mean “metal head Tony”?? Haaa haa. We have had our ups and downs. During the lows I used to say to myself, ‘there you have it we are too different’ but now I see this as a strength (as long as the metal music goes into the headphones or lone car trips). Thanks for posting!
February 6th, 2011 at 2:59 pm
“the appreciating of difference….
that’s new for me. way new. like, i’ve started thinking about it consciously and without aversion in, say, the last, six weeks.”
tee hee. yes. i’ve only been with my guy for a matter of months and we have great things and not so great things. for me, it all comes down to communication. can you communicate with each other in a way that is effective to both of you? working on that. and i have to consciously remind myself to think about differences without aversion. it’s work, but it’s (mostly) fun work.